In the Brown soil zone at Swift Current, wheat suffered a yield loss of 37% following two years alfalfa compared to the barley-flax rotation – likely due to lower soil moisture following alfalfa.
In general, wheat yield was higher on alfalfa and red clover stubble compared to barley-flax rotation in soil zones with higher moisture. For example, at Saskatoon (Dark Brown), wheat yield was 45% higher after the alfalfa rotation and 60% higher after the red clover rotation compared to the barley-flax rotation.
Wheat yields on the barley-pea rotation were often statistically similar, but not always, to the forage rotations.
Yield benefits carried over to canola
At Saskatoon, Lanigan, and Melfort canola yield was higher on alfalfa and red clover stubble compared to the barley-flax rotation. Melfort had the highest response with canola yield 64% higher in the alfalfa rotation compared to barley-flax rotation. At Saskatoon and Melfort, canola yield was 55% higher in the red clover rotation compared to barley-flax. Canola yield was not significantly affected by previous crop rotations at Swift Current.
Canola yields on the barley-pea rotation were often statistically similar to the forage rotations.
Changes in soil P
After the four-year rotation, P balance was calculated as the difference between the total P added from fertilizer P and harvested P removed from the system in crop biomass. Each crop was fertilized with 15 kg P2O5 per ha. This relatively low amount of P fertilization resulted in a gradual drain on soil P fertility.
Without adequate P replenishment through fertilizer addition or manuring, especially in the forage legume rotations where P removal is higher, the researchers anticipate that yield impacts caused by lower P fertility will eventually occur. Therefore, it is critical to apply sufficient P to match the crop P removal over time in order to preserve the soil P fertility over the long-term.
Click here for PDF
Source : Canadian Agronomist