The utilization and adoption of double cropping continues to gain acceptance as a production practice among U.S. farmers. A Michigan State University study concluded that double cropping, and large-scale production of diverse crops, could benefit food and biofuel production and “deserves more study for widespread application.” The soy checkoff continues to invest in research to confirm the value of this production option to soybean farmers.
The Soybean Research and Information Network, or SRIN, shares double-cropping recommendations from checkoff-funded research across all soybean production regions. For example, Oklahoma research found that wheat residue has no impact on soybean yields. That means farmers can plant soybeans within hours of harvesting winter wheat if soil moisture is adequate.
“We advise growers in a double-cropped soybean system to apply a pre-plant, long-term residual herbicide with their burndown program,” said Josh Lofton, Oklahoma State University cropping system specialist. “It’s an input that is often omitted in a double-crop system. We found in our data by including the residual herbicide, they can get as much value, if not more, as in full-season soybeans. We also recommend inoculant, especially in high-residue situations.”
Double-cropping soybeans along with corn and adding a wheat crop can be a profitable alternative to a traditional corn/soybean rotation. Good timing, careful planning and strong stand establishment are just some of the factors that are critical for a successful double-crop system.