The National Farmers Union and Farmers Union Enterprises are also part of the coalition against the EPA.
Parts of the RFS provided refineries with less than 75,000 barrels per day of crude oil throughput with temporary exemptions.
After two years, the refineries could ask for exemption extensions if they could prove the RFS requirements were causing “disproportionate economic hardship,” an RFA release said yesterday.
The ethanol groups allege the EPA granted further exemptions “in secret,” saving the refineries about “$170 million in compliance costs.” They do not believe the refineries are facing any financial stress.
“It’s difficult to see what economic hardship these refineries are facing,” Kevin Skunes, president of the National Corn Growers Association, said in a statement yesterday. “America’s corn farmers, who are expecting their fifth consecutive year of low commodity prices and who are experiencing the lowest net farm income since 2006, understand economic challenges.”
The coalition is asking the EPA for transparency in its decisions to grant the exemptions, given that the refineries involved all reported successful years.
“EPA should be forced to explain why an otherwise profitable refinery faces disproportionate hardship from compliance with the RFS,” the statement said.
Farms.com has reached out to the EPA for comment on the legal proceedings.