“‘We got outcompeted by South American interests,’ Peter Bachmann, president and CEO of the USA Rice Federation, said of the decline,” Ward reported. “The change in leadership, he added, could present ‘an opportunity for either commercial sales to be reinstated and – or – potential food aid.'”
“However, Karen Hansen-Kuhn, director of trade and international strategies at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, warned that the manner of Maduro’s ouster and Trump’s further veiled threats to other governments in the region risk undermining any ag trade gains – and could harm U.S. trade interests,” Ward reported. “…’There’s bound to be a political reaction in Latin America, given our history,’ Hansen-Kuhn said. ‘It’s entirely likely that many Latin Americans will be even less disposed to buy from [the U.S.].'”
Oil Reserves Could Eventually Help Reduce Farmer Expenses
AgWeb’s Rhonda Brooks reported that “while current headlines focus on immediate geopolitical shifts and the actions of energy companies, the resulting ripple effects could eventually reduce U.S. farmers’ fuel expenses and other input costs, according to Bob Elliott, co-founder of Unlimited Funds.”
“However, Elliot emphasizes that even if Western oil companies successfully establish operations in Venezuela, it will take years to repair the damaged infrastructure there and bring a meaningful new supply of oil online,” Brooks reported. “…If Western investment is successful, Venezuela could eventually add ‘a few million barrels per day’ to the world’s supply, a volume significant enough to help drive global oil prices lower, Elliott notes. Over time, this increase in supply could ease costs for diesel and gasoline, reduce input expenses (including fertilizer and freight) and generally improve the overall cost of production for farmers.”
Source : illinois.edu