“Kathleen Merrigan, the first agriculture deputy secretary in the Obama administration, said one of the reasons cited for the changes to move USDA employees closer to farmers doesn’t make sense,” Hagstrom and Neeley reported. “‘With 90% of employees in the field, USDA has always been a field-based department, so marketing this as a strategy to be closer to farmers doesn’t add up,’ she said. ‘As for saving money, the reorganization will cost more than it will save. The biggest impact, if Congress allows this to proceed, will be loss of more civil service talent, the result of forcing USDA leaders to choose between their careers and the needs of their families.'”
“National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition Policy Director Mike Lavender said the administration should consult farmers before reorganizing the agency,” Hagstrom and Neeley reported. “‘Without input from farmers, the proposed USDA reorganization would close offices and lead to further staff reductions and ultimately farmers would pay the price,’ he said.”
E&E News’ Marc Heller reported that “the freshly installed deputy secretary of the Agriculture Department will testify this week on the agency’s plan to vacate buildings and relocate more than half of its 4,600 Washington-area employees to other parts of the country. Stephen Vaden, who was sworn in July 7 and will lead the reorganization effort, should expect sharp questions Wednesday from the Senate Agriculture, Nutrition and Forestry Committee, which hastily called the hearing after the USDA announced the plan without first informing lawmakers.”
Source : illinois.edu