“Bessent added that the tariff reductions don’t apply to sectoral duties imposed on all US trading partners, and the tariffs applied on China during the first Trump administration remain in place,” Leonard reported. “Asked what would happen at the end of 90 days to avoid tariffs ratcheting back up, Bessent indicated there’s a chance to extend the truce further.”
CNBC’s Jesse Pound reported Monday morning that “Bessent said Monday that he expects to meet with Chinese officials again in the coming weeks to continue trade negotiations. ‘I would imagine in the next few weeks we will be meeting again to get rolling on a more fulsome agreement,’ Bessent said on CNBC’s ‘Squawk Box.'”
How Tariff Pause Could Benefit U.S. Ag
The tariff pause with China could, at least temporarily, help calm some concerns from the U.S. agriculture industry over exports, with China remaining such an important customer for U.S. ag products.
Reuters’ Mei Mei Chu reported at the beginning of March that “about half of U.S. soybeans, the country’s largest agricultural export to China, were shipped to the Asian nation in 2024, totalling $12.8 billion in trade, according to U.S. data. However, China has increasingly relied on cheaper and abundant Brazilian soybeans to reduce its dependence on U.S. supplies. This has resulted in the U.S. market share in China dropping to 21% in 2024 from 40% in 2016, according to Chinese customs data.”
Overall, Chu reported, “China imported $29.25 billion worth of U.S. agricultural products in 2024, a 14% decline from the previous year, extending a 20% drop in 2023. U.S. agricultural exports to China have declined since 2018 after Beijing slapped tariffs of up to 25% on soybeans, beef, pork, wheat, corn and sorghum in retaliation for duties on Chinese goods imposed by Trump.”
In addition, Farm Policy News reported in October 2024 that United States corn and soybean farmers could lose billions of dollars in annual production value in the event of a potential new tariff-induced US-China trade war, according to a new economic study commissioned by the American Soybean Association and the National Corn Growers Association and conducted by the World Agricultural Economic and Environmental Services.
The study found that “U.S. soybean farmers (could) lose an average of $3.6 to $5.9 billion in annual production value” while “U.S. corn farmers (could) lose an average of $0.9 to $1.4 billion in annual production value” depending on how China would respond to increased U.S. tariffs.
Some Non-Tariff Barriers Also Paused
Reuters’ Lewis Jackson reported that “China also committed to removing non-tariff countermeasures imposed against the United States since April 2, although it remains unclear how some of these measures will be walked back.”
“As part of its retaliation in April, China added rare earths to its controlled export list, opened an anti-dumping probe into chemical firm DuPont’s China business and blacklisted some U.S. defense and tech firms,” Jackson reported. “The wording of the agreement suggests those firms will be removed from the list, which barred trade and investment with China and the anti-dumping probe shelved.”
“The statement only said countermeasures imposed after April 2 will be removed, which would therefore not include a dozen companies blacklisted in March, and the anti-dumping investigation into Google announced in February,” Jackson reported.
Source : illinois.edu