
Figure 1. The Double Ovsynch protocol laid out in a weekly calendar format. The entire protocol can be shifted to any desired combination of treatment times, as long as the intervals between treatments remain the same: G1 – 7d – PG1 – 3d – G2 – 7d – G3 – 7d – PG2 – 56 hours – G4 – 16 hours – AI. The third PG is optional.
What Ovsynch1 Accomplishes
The first half of the Double Ovsynch protocol is intended to accomplish presynchronization, bringing the majority of cows into a similar stage of their estrous cycle with ideal conditions for the start of Ovsynch2. The aim is to increase the percentage of cows that are on days 5 to 8 of their estrous cycle with intermediate levels of progesterone in circulation and a healthy, dominant follicle that can potentially ovulate in response to G3. Catching most cows in this early stage of the cycle also decreases the risk of corpus luteum (CL) regression by natural means before the PG treatment of Ovsynch2, since it is best to maintain high progesterone concentration clear up to the time of PG treatment (Carvalho et al., 2018).
Inclusion of GnRH into a presynchronization strategy, as is done with Ovsynch1, increases conception rates by addressing the anovular condition that is present in many cows before initiation of the Ovsynch protocol (Fricke, 2018). In one research study, the use of Double Ovsynch reduced the percentage of animals with low progesterone concentrations at the start of Ovsynch2 (i.e., potentially anovular) from 25% down to just 5% and improved conception rates at the first postpartum service by 8 percentage points (Herlihy et al., 2012). In another study, Double Ovsynch increased the percentage of cows starting Ovsynch2 with a CL from 68% to 94% when compared to Presynch Ovsynch, clearly a reduction in the percentage of anovular cows (Ayres et al., 2013). These benefits are especially evident in first lactation cows (Souza et al., 2008).
An Improvement to Consider
Double Ovsynch is designed to synchronize ovulation precisely enough to allow for TAI and high conception rates. However, there is one challenge that has become a growing issue with high-producing dairy cows: a single PG treatment is sometimes inadequate for causing complete regression of a young CL induced by GnRH treatment (Carvalho et al., 2018), such as G3 of this protocol. Doubling up the final PG treatment by administering a second treatment 24 hours after the first treatment helps address the challenge, resulting in complete luteal regression nearly 100% of the time. Double PG treatment leads to an increase in conception rates by several percentage points (Borchardt et al., 2018), especially in older cows (Wiltbank et al., 2015). This extra PG treatment, as shown on Figure 1, is worth considering for improved TAI effectiveness.
Advantages and Disadvantages
In general, good presynchronization programs result in absolute conception rate improvements of 10 to 20 percent at first AI (Carvalho et al., 2018), and Double Ovsynch consistently ranks as one of the top protocols in terms of results.
Making the effort to administer a lengthy series of treatments with Double Ovsynch can pay off. Across several studies, the conception rate difference between Double Ovsynch and Presynch Ovsynch, another commonly used TAI protocol, significantly favored Double Ovsynch. Borchardt et al. (2017) found an approximately 4.5 percentage point advantage with Double Ovsynch, though most of the difference was amongst the primiparous cows. Success will vary from group to group, as was seen in one study where Double Ovsynch led to a significantly higher conception rate in primiparous cows (44%) than in multiparous cows (31%; Astiz et al., 2013).
Double Ovsynch also works well as a resynchronization protocol (Giordano et al., 2012), with higher conception rates as compared to regular Ovsynch (39% vs. 30%), as long as there is enough time to complete the entire protocol without sacrificing too many days open.
Conclusion
Double Ovsynch is an excellent, well-researched TAI protocol with proven success and significant advantages over most other protocols. It addresses some of the biggest challenges in reproductive management – heat detection, anovular cows, and conception rates – making it a potentially valuable option, but it does take commitment to the protocol and attentive management to make sure each treatment is administered to every cow at the correct time.
The content of this document, including text, graphics, and images, is educational only and not intended to be a substitute for veterinary medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Always seek the advice of a licensed Doctor of Veterinary Medicine or other licensed or certified veterinary medical professional with any questions you may have regarding a veterinary medical condition or symptom.
Where trade names appear, no discrimination is intended, and no endorsement by Penn State Extension is implied.
Source : psu.edu