“The president, as he conveyed publicly Thursday, likes the messaging of using direct tariff revenue for the farm aid package, rather than tapping other funds, according to two of the people familiar,” Yarrow and Lee Hill reported.
Axios’ Ben Berkowitz and Madison Mills reported that “farmers quickly welcomed Thursday’s news.”
“‘If Trump is gonna use these tariffs as a weapon… I’m not saying it’s right or wrong… to a farmer it’s gonna seem fair if he’s being used as an international policy tool that he get compensated for it,” Rick Foust, a soybean and wheat farmer in north central Kansas, tells Axios,” according to Berkowitz and Mills. “‘Chances are it’s gonna cost (farmers) $10 and they’ll get $5 back.'”
Legal Questions Remain about Using Tariff Revenue
Agri-Pulse’s Oliver Ward reported that “the administration has been considering using its Section 32 authority to support farmers. Section 32 is funded by 30% of tariff receipts, which officials can use to buy surplus commodities in order to boost domestic consumption, encourage farm exports and increase farmers’ purchasing power, according to the Congressional Research Service. It has historically been used to buy commodities not covered by other mandatory support programs.”
“But there are legal restrictions on how officials can use Section 32. Only $350 million can be spent on restoring farmers’ purchasing power through direct payments, Bart Fischer, co-director of the agricultural and food policy center at Texas A&M University, said during the Ag Outlook Forum,” Ward reported. “The bulk of the revenues has to be used to fund child nutrition programs administered by USDA’s Food and Nutrition Service.”
Source : illinois.edu