With the overexploitation of animals and plants being a major threat to nature, and new international pledges to halt species extinctions and ensure the harvest, use and trade in wild species is sustainable as part of the UN-brokered deal for nature—the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework—now in place, the researchers set out to identify potential gaps in international trade protections for the world's biodiversity.
The study was conducted by a team of ecologists and wildlife trade experts at the University of Oxford, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the UN Environment Program World Conservation Monitoring Center (UNEP-WCMC) and ZSL. The research was published in Nature Ecology and Evolution, and it cross-references wildlife trade information with data on species under threat.
International wildlife trade protections are set by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES), as part of which signatory countries—termed "Parties to the Convention"—periodically decide on trade controls for thousands of animal and plant species. About 40,000 species are currently included in the CITES Appendices. However, in the absence of a robust, repeatable methodology to inform the listing process, there is the potential that species threatened by international trade could be missing out on much-needed global protections.