Drought-related crop insurance payments
Alfalfa and other types of hay alone account for almost half – 46 percent – of all Colorado River water consumption. Unsurprisingly, farmers of these and other livestock feed crops also got the most drought-related crop insurance payments, more than $2 billion.
To determine drought-related indemnities, EWG combined payments for drought, heat, failure in irrigation water supply or irrigation equipment, and “rainfall index” policies, which pay out if the farmer’s local area receives less rain during part of the growing season than long-term averages.
Of the seven states, farmers in California collected by far the most drought-related payments, $2.1 billion, and Colorado the second most, over $1 billion.
Although much of California’s agricultural land is outside the Colorado River Basin, some of the river’s water is channeled to farms (and cities) there. And in the seven basin states, the increasing drought conditions and dwindling water resources within the basin match conditions outside the basin.
Irrigation payments
The EQIP conservation initiative gives farmers money and technical assistance to implement conservation practices on working farmland. The program includes conservation practices like cover crops and grassed waterways, as well as structural, equipment and facility practices like fencing and pipes.
Farmers can’t use EQIP funds to bring any new acres under irrigation, but the program does subsidize the implementation of certain types of watering practices for crops already being irrigated. For example, EQIP pays farmers to switch from dirt irrigation ditches to plastic irrigation pipes.
But in many Western states, “use it or lose it” water rights policies encourage farmers to use their entire water allotment, even if their crops don’t need that amount of water. So more efficient irrigation practices likely don’t reduce total water use.
Click here to see more...