"They consistently performed among the top of all the lines in each environment. Showing similar levels of resistance across locations is a really good indicator they're reliable," says Sarah Lipps, doctoral student and lead author on the study. "And because these lines are available to the public, anybody can use them in a breeding program to develop resistant hybrids."
Jamann notes that "these two accessions weren't perfect. There was still a little bit of disease on them, but I think it's a good starting point. There are definitely improvements to be made, but they were consistent across a lot of environments for us."
In addition to identifying two promising sources of resistance, the study offers a new method of scoring tar spot incidence and severity in the field.
"Generally speaking, when we rate foliar diseases, we use a 0-100% scale," Lipps says. "But with tar spot, because it makes these small dots on the leaf, it's really difficult to accurately estimate 5% versus 20%, etc. It's also hard to estimate disease on a percentage scale across thousands of plants for this disease."
"Looking in the literature, we found a rating scale used for anthracnose—another fungal disease—that considers incidence as well as coverage in the plot. So we developed a one-to-nine rating scale for tar spot. It is somewhat similar to what is being used in Latin America to score tar spot and works well for our purposes."
Click here to see more...