By Dr. Kenny Burdine
Over the last year, we have discussed price differentials between bulls and steers, and for weaned calves versus those straight off the cow. In both cases, there are management implications for cow-calf producers. Most of the time, there is a price advantage when steers and for selling preconditioned calves. The producer must decide if that price benefit is sufficient to justify implementing the management practice. In this article, I want to discuss the impact that feeder cattle muscling has on market value. While this is not a year-to-year decision in the same way that castration and preconditioning are, calf muscling is something that producers need to keep in mind as they make long term genetic decisions for their cow-herds.
Feeder cattle are generally graded based on two factors, (1) frame size and (2) muscling. Frame sizes are based on the expected weight of the animal when finished – large, medium, and small. Muscle grades are based on the thickness of the muscle, with a number 1 being the thickest / heaviest muscled. More detailed information about these grades can be found on the AMS website here.
While there are many ways to estimate the impact of muscling on calf prices, I am going to take a simple historical approach in this article. For market reporting purposes, cattle are often grouped by a combination of frame and muscle grades. For example, market reports typically share prices for Medium and Large Frame #1-2 calves and for Medium and Large Frame #2-3 calves. By comparing these price differences over time, one can get a feel for how much price discount is seen on calves that fall into the lighter muscling category.