5 Things You Need to Know About E. coli Detection in the U.S. Swine Population

Jan 19, 2026

E. coli remains one of the most frequently detected bacterial agents in swine samples tested at U.S. veterinary diagnostic laboratories. Understanding long-term trends in E. coli virulence gene detection is key to interpreting diagnostic results and guiding prevention strategies.

Here are five things you need to know about E. coli detection.

1. Not all E. coli are the same; virulence factors matter
Although E. coli is a normal inhabitant of the pig gut, only a subset of strains poses a health risk. The pathogenic potential of this bacterium depends on the presence and combination of specific virulence factors, including attachment genes (e.g., F18) and toxin genes (e.g., STb). The detection of virulence factors within a single isolate defines a virotype (e.g., F18:STb), which can then be classified into pathotypes (e.g., ETEC) based on disease mechanisms. Tracking these combinations is crucial for distinguishing harmless strains from those associated with clinical disease.

2. There is more beyond E. coli isolation
Once a sample arrives at the diagnostic laboratory, it is first processed for bacterial culture, which may result in the isolation of E. coli. While culture confirms bacterial growth and allows selection of representative colonies for antimicrobial assays, it does not consistently provide information on the pathogenic potential of the isolated E. coli. To address this, E. coli colonies may be subsequently tested by PCR genotyping for a panel of virulence genes. In recent years, over 30% of isolated E. coli have been characterized as not pathogenic, emphasizing the importance of PCR genotyping.

3. Shifts in the detection of virulence factors in the U.S.
In a recent study, notable shifts were observed in key virulence factors of E. coli over time. The detection of F18 increased substantially from 46% in 2014 to 76% in 2024, while in contrast, the F4 (K88) adhesin declined from 33.5% to 13.6%. Among toxin genes, Stx2e showed a marked increase in detection, rising from 17% to 63% between 2014 and 2024. Conversely, the EAST1 toxin decreased from 64% to 31.2% in the same period.

4. Virotypes are shifting toward more complex combinations
Changes in virulence factor detection resulted in significant shifts at the virotype level. Notably, the virotype F18:LT:STa:STb:Stx2e was not detected in 2014 but became the most common virotype by 2024, accounting for 38% of the detected strains. This highlights an increasing dominance of isolates carrying multiple toxin genes.

Click here to see more...