Each party offered its own vision for ensuring the growth and resilience of Canadian agriculture, even as their approaches differed on key policy questions.
A strong consensus emerged around reducing interprovincial trade barriers and modernising regulations to strengthen Canada’s domestic agricultural market. Business Risk Management (BRM) programs were also widely discussed, with all parties acknowledging the need for improvements, though the Conservatives and Greens argued for a complete review of these programs.
The debate also addressed supply management, where all participants confirmed their commitment to its protection during future trade negotiations.
When it came to regulatory agencies like the Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA) and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA), several parties echoed CFA’s call for an economic competitiveness lens to guide regulatory decisions.
During discussions on trade, the Conservatives and Liberals both committed to opposing country of origin labelling and highlighted the need for strong negotiating positions in future reviews of the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA).
Infrastructure also featured prominently, with every party supporting investment in port facilities and broadband expansion to support rural communities and the next generation of farmers. The Conservatives highlighted their proposal for an energy utility corridor, which they argue would free up rail lines for agricultural exports.
“The debate is an excellent opportunity to give farmers across the country an idea of their party’s vision for the future, to help inform their votes. CFA is very thankful to all the representatives that took part in the debate,” said Keith Currie, President of the CFA. “CFA looks forward to working together with all representatives in our next federal government to help Canadian agriculture reach its vast potential.”
Photo Credit: CFA_Leaders-Debate