According to co-author Marin Skidmore, “Farmers may have an interest in trying new practices, but there’s a steep learning curve and high costs involved. Programs like this, where farmer leaders adopt practices that can be seen and communicated throughout a region, can really inspire their neighbors to take action.”
Unlike earlier case studies, this research used satellite images to measure adoption over time. The team tracked the spread of cover crop acreage as the program expanded across neighboring watersheds.
Adoption rose from 6% to 9%, and increases were strongest within 5 to 10 kilometers of demonstration farms.
Skidmore added, “After ruling out many alternative explanations like changes in state policy or farm income, we found a statistically significant increase in cover crop adoption in the program region as a whole.”
The timeline also matters. Co-author Chloe Wardropper explained that adoption does not happen immediately. “We first saw increases in adoption the year after the program became active. If we saw immediate increases, that wouldn’t make sense,” she said. Farmers needed time to observe the demonstration, learn, and adjust their practices.
Adoption peaked four years after the program began, showing strong diffusion of information and changing social norms.
Skidmore noted, “Our results are supportive of the idea that leveraging demonstration farms and producers as sources of information can be an effective tool in conservation programming and a complement to existing payment-based programs.”
Wardropper added that program success depends on proximity and long-term planning—more demonstration farms and sustained funding could lead to even wider adoption.