- Labile nutrients
- Moderately labile nutrients
- Non-labile nutrients
These conceptual pools of nutrients are not mutually exclusive. They will change over time based on the amount of nutrients in each pool, but the rate of change will vary, with changes occurring more rapidly in the labile pool and very slowly in the non-labile pool. The point here is that “non-labile” does not necessarily mean the nutrients will not be available to the crop at some point.
Why P fixation is different than K and ammonium fixation
Normally, when we talk about fixation, we are talking about K and ammonium. These ions can fit in pockets on the outside layers of 2:1 clay that is present in most Minnesota soils. As clays shrink and swell, it can affect the release of K to the soil solution. In this case, what we think of as “fixation” is K or ammonium being trapped inside clay layers.
P, on the other hand, is highly reactive with other ions in the soil and can form compounds of varying solubility, with calcium in high pH soils and iron and aluminum in low pH soil. P is not "fixed' in the same sense as K and ammonium. Phosphorus forms compounds in the soil with calcium, iron, and aluminum that can be very insoluble, making P in the soil less available for crop uptake.
Research in Iowa and Minnesota
While people normally think nutrient fixation means that the nutrients are not available to the crop, some recent research in Iowa indicates that this may not be true. Researchers from Iowa State University has found instances where potassium fertilizer does not increase soil test K on some soils but corn or soybean grain yield is increased. However, the amount of “fixed” K in the soil increased in relationship to the amount of K fertilizer applied even though the extractable K was not impacted. Since the crop responded to K, that means that the fixed fraction may not be as “fixed” as believed and may be a bigger part of the annual K cycling to crops.
One of our current projects, funded by the Minnesota Corn Research and Promotion Council, is looking more into fixed potassium in Minnesota and see how it may be impacting crop yields here. This work is in the early stages as we are looking into interactions between applied nitrogen fertilizer and potassium and how that affects fixed potassium and ammonium in the soil. We are also in the process of developing better options for determining available K for crops with this project, as well as other research focused on better understanding K dynamics in the soil.
Lastly, I have been asked about whether biological products can “unlock” fixed nutrients. The simple answer is that there is nothing out there that can be considered a silver bullet that would allow us to not apply fertilizer. Soils that are low in available nutrients will need fertilizer or manure application to produce a profitable corn crop.
Source : umn.edu