Crop maturity affects forage yield and quality
Maturity is a primary factor determining intermediate wheatgrass forage yield and quality (feeding value). With increased maturity from vegetative to early flowering, forage yield increases while forage quality decreases (Figure 1). This increase in yield is associated with an increase in the proportion of stem and a decline in leaf proportion as stems elongate (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Intermediate wheatgrass forage yield increases with maturity, while relative forage quality (RFQ) declines.

Figure 2. Intermediate wheatgrass leaf, stem, and inflorescence fractions change with maturity. Leaves predominate early in the season while stems predominate at flowering. Leaf loss from lower in the canopy can contribute to decline in leaf proportion.
Reduced leaf to stem ratio is the primary cause of forage quality decline with maturity. Leaves are higher in nutrients and relative feed value than stems and lower in fiber (Table 1). Leaf quality declines less with maturity than stem quality because of a rapid increase of fibrous, structural components of stems as they elongate.
Table 1. Forage quality of intermediate wheatgrass leaves and stem at initiation of stem elongation and at anthesis (pollen shedding). Leaf blades only were analyzed. Leaf sheaths were attached to the stem.
Maturity stage | Component | Component proportion | Crude protein | Relative forage value |
---|
| | % | % | |
2-nodes | leaf | 57 | 21 | 126 |
| stem | 43 | 12 | 95 |
Anthesis | leaf | 28 | 19 | 113 |
| stem | 56 | 7 | 68 |
| inflorescence | 16 | 7 | 89 |
Dual-use harvests for grain and forage
In grain production systems, forage can be harvested in the spring before the initiation of stem elongation and in fall following regrowth after grain harvest (Figure 3). In both spring and fall, intermediate wheatgrass will be vegetative and low growing and grazing may be the best approach to utilization. Because the forage is vegetative it is high quality. Straw that is mostly stems can be used as bedding or harvested and mixed into livestock rations. Fall forage grazing can increase net returns per acre by 10-20% compared to only grain and straw harvest, but grazing in the spring after tiller elongation can adversely affect grain yields due to removal of seed heads.
Yields of both forage and straw will be affected by N fertilization. Rates of 80 lbs. of nitrogen per acre are commonly recommended for grain production.
Harvest as a hay crop
Intermediate wheatgrass can also be harvested exclusively as a hay crop using similar strategies as used for traditional cool season forage grasses. Hay harvest is likely most economically viable in older stands when production of Kernza grain decreases. Intermediate wheatgrass is a cool season perennial like orchardgrass or smooth bromegrass and that produces most of its forage during the first spring growth and smaller amounts in the late summer and fall. Forage harvesting decisions are a compromise based on forage yield and quality goals (Figure 1).
We compared the forage yield and relative forage value from harvest systems when the first harvest occurred at boot stage vs. dough stage. For the first harvest, forage yield was higher for intermediate wheatgrass harvested at dough stage than when harvested at boot (Figure 4). Fall yields (harvests in September and October) following post-grain harvest regrowth were less than for the first harvest and were greater when the first harvest was at boot stage. Cumulative growing season forage yields were strongly influenced by the first harvest yields and averaged 1.8 and 2.1 T/acre for the boot, and dough first harvest systems, respectively. These yields were a function of the N fertilizer rate of 60 lbs. per acre applied to 3-year-old stands and would be increased at higher N rates.
Forage relative feed value (RFV) is an indicator of forage quality and was greatest at the boot stage first harvest and declined at dough stage. The RFV for subsequent harvests was similar for the two systems and reflects the vegetative maturity of the crop.

Figure 3. Use of Kernza intermediate wheatgrass for both
grain and forage production

Figure 4. Summer and fall forage yield and relative feed value (RFV) of intermediated wheatgrass when the summer harvest occurred at boot or dough stage.
We have not measured persistence of intermediate wheatgrass stands in Minnesota under different forage harvest systems, however, previous research in dryer regions has shown that its persistence is reduced by three or more harvests during the year. Therefore, we recommend harvest systems with only a summer and fall harvest in Minnesota until more research is done.
Source : umn.edu