Dairy Enterprise and Crop Budgets for Pennsylvania

Dairy Enterprise and Crop Budgets for Pennsylvania
Jan 21, 2022

Subscribe to our Newsletters

By VIRGINIA A. ISHLER and TIM BECK

The dairy industry has experienced many changes and challenges over the past decades. The three-year cyclic milk market no longer exists. In the past producers could rely on the cycle to produce a good, medium, and poor price year. In the past 20 years, 2007 and 2014 generated stellar milk prices, but the periods in between and since 2014 have not been sufficient to maintain competitive costs of production for many dairy operations. This has led to dairies going out of business or switching to alternative agricultural endeavors. For Pennsylvania dairy operations to be competitive nationally, breakeven margins must be sustainable allowing producers to cash flow, pay down debt, and reinvest in the business. The Extension Dairy Business Management Team has been using FINBIN® to summarize financial data and to compare to other state’s numbers. The University of Minnesota houses the financial data. Pennsylvania (PA) and Minnesota (MN) have the largest number of dairy farms represented and will be used for comparison.  

Pennsylvania ranks seventh and MN eighth in the country for the pounds of milk produced annually. The keystone state has 5,430 dairy operations with an average herd size of 89 cows compared to MN with 3,470 herds averaging 180 to 200 cows. Milk production and cow numbers are similar (Table 1). Minnesota has higher acreage devoted to grain production compared to PA, whereas the opposite is true regarding forage production.

Table 1. State dynamics for dairy operations in Pennsylvania and Minnesota for 2020.

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Milk cows, no.475,000455,000
Milk produced, lbs.10,276,000,00010,149,000,000
Milk produced, lbs./hd.21,32022,705
Corn silage, acres485,000420,000
Corn silage yield, tons/acre1923
Market price/ton--
Hay, acres960,000490,000
Hay yield, tons/acre2.21.8
Market price/ton$174$85
Corn grain, acres1,000,0007,510,000
Corn grain, bushels/acre138191
Market price/bushel$5.51$4.52
Soybeans, acres630,0007,380,000
Soybeans, bushels/acre4650
Market price/bushel$11.30$11.00

Source: USDA NASS 2020 State Agricultural Overview (as of January 2021).

Four years of financial data was summarized using FINBIN® for PA and MN (Table 2). Even though the PA farms generated more income compared to MN, there was a large difference in the expenses resulting in a competitive cost of production for MN compared to PA.  Feed cost per cow explains part of the variation and the other differences are embedded in the overheads. Based on multiple years of analyzing PA herds, feed costs, especially home-raised feeds, are the bottleneck to sustainable costs of production.

The herd dynamics in the FINBIN® database are comparable to what was reported by USDA-NASS. Both states are similar however, the FINBIN® database contains larger herd sizes than the state average coupled with higher annual milk production. Both states had similar milk prices. The differences in cost of production have more to do with the expense side of the equation. Approximately 54% of the milk income from these herds is going toward feed costs. It is not just purchased feed, which can include both forages and grains, but the cost to produce home-raised feeds that can undermine a competitive cost of production.

Tables 3 through 6 list the financial summaries for corn silage, grass hay, corn grain and soybeans. Other forages are not listed since the FINBIN® database had a very low number of entries over the past four years. The financial database shows the same trends as the USDA-NASS report where MN is committing a higher amount of acreage to grain production compared to PA operations where more acreage goes to silage production.

Corn silage and grass hay were the two forages with the most data entries over the past four years (Tables 3 and 4). Even though both states had similar cost of production ($/ton) for silage, the yields were much higher for MN farms, which matches with the USDA-NASS data. Pennsylvania operations are doing a better job at hay production based on yield per acre. Comparing the cost of production ($/ton) for both states, MN can purchase grass hay cheaper (Table 1) than they can produce it (Table 4). Operations in PA however are producing hay much cheaper than the market price listed for 2020. The problem for PA herds is not having ample acreage for the number of animals on-farm. Many times, producers need to purchase grass hay to feed dry cows and heifers. Having to pay $174/ton for hay versus a cost of production of $111/ton can quickly increase feed costs and erode a competitive cost of production for the dairy enterprise.

For grain production (Tables 5 and 6), the cost of production is competitive for both states compared to what the market is paying for corn and soybeans. In the FINBIN® database, MN has much higher yields per acre for corn grain compared to PA, however, the keystone state has higher soybean yields. There are some noteworthy differences in the financial summary for grain production. The PA farms are dairy operations producing grains either to feed on-farm or to sell as a cash crop. The MN farms are probably a combination of livestock and crop only producers. These farms had additional expenses related to storage, handling, trucking, and marketing. This explains some of the higher expense categories on the MN operations compared to PA.  

The Extension dairy business management team has been working with dairy producers for several years analyzing their financial data for the dairy, whole farm, and cropping enterprises. Recently, PA added their data to the Minnesota FINBIN® database. This provides the opportunity for producers to compare their numbers to other PA farms as well as another similar state. The challenge for PA herds is lowering their cost of production to remain competitive with the rest of the nation. This is crucial if the dairy industry is to grow and thrive in the northeast.

Table 2. Four-year average financial summary for Pennsylvania and Minnesota (2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019)

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Number of farms911174
Income/cow:  
Milk income$4,444$4,218
Dairy calves$72$72
Cull sales$232$233
Other income$33$141
Total inflow$4,781$4,664
Direct expenses/cow:  
Total feed costs$2,352$2,298
Breeding$58$63
Veterinary$113$129
Supplies$113$142
Contracting$130$123
Fuel and oil$105$84
Repairs$215$169
Hauling and trucking$189$64
Marketing$131*
Bedding$92$95
Miscellaneous$110$231
Total$3,608$3,398
Overheads/cow:  
Hired labor$508$505
Building leases$149*
Farm insurance$69*
Interest$148$105
Machine & bldg depreciation$247$199
Miscellaneous$131$247
Total$1,252$1,056
   
Total outflow$4,860$4,454
Net return over labor and management/cow-$389$10
Cost of production/cwt of milk with labor & mgt$19.55$17.18
Other information:  
Number of cows342223
Milk production/cow24,71824,633
Feed cost/cwt of milk9.519.33
Avg. milk price/cwt17.9817.24
Margin/cwt8.477.91

* If a value is not listed, it is incorporated into another sub-category.
Note: Most values were rounded up.

Table 3. Four-year average corn silage financial summary for Pennsylvania and Minnesota (2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019)

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Number of farms791072
Acres196106
Yield/acre, tons1922
Direct expenses/acre  
Seed$97$103
Fertilizer$55$84
Crop chemicals$63$37
Custom hire$121$58
Land rent$108$158
Total$444$440
Overheads/acre:  
Hired labor$49$30
Fuel and oil$10$33
Repairs$19$51
Utilities$9$5
Interest$13$16
Farm/crop Insurance$6$22
Machine leases$2$8
Bldg leases$8$2
Machine & bldg depreciation$18$44
Dues and professional fees$4$3
Miscellaneous$4$21
Total$142$236
   
Total outflow$586$676
Net return over labor and management/acre$285$52
Cost of production/ton with labor & mgt$32$31

Table 4. Four-year average grass hay financial summary for Pennsylvania and Minnesota (2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019)

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Number of farms56364
Acres4855
Yield/acre, tons32.1
Direct expenses/acre  
Seed$5$0
Fertilizer$17$6
Crop chemicals$2$0
Custom hire$48$8
Land rent$93$68
Total$166$82
Overheads/acre:  
Hired labor$46$10
Fuel and oil$11$15
Repairs$20$23
Utilities$9$2
Interest$15$9
Farm/crop Insurance$7$4
Mach leases$1$3
Bldg leases$3$0
Machine & bldg depreciation$27$25
Dues and professional fees$3$2
Miscellaneous$3$8
Total$146$101
   
Total outflow$312$183
Net return over labor and management/acre$158-$19
Cost of production/ton with labor & mgt$111$95

Table 5. Four-year average corn grain financial summary for Pennsylvania and Minnesota (2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019)

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Number of farms465516
Acres104332
Yield/acre, bushels168189
Direct expenses/acre  
Seed$114$107
Fertilizer$64$118
Crop chemicals$75$34
Custom hire$51$12
Land rent$118$195
Total$423$467
Overheads/acre:  
Hired labor$27$16
Fuel and oil$7$24
Repairs$16$44
Utilities$6$5
Interest$8$21
Farm/crop Insurance$5$29
Machine leases$1$9
Bldg leases$5$2
Machine & bldg depreciation$17$48
Dues and professional fees$2$4
Miscellaneous$2$33
Total$96$235
   
Total outflow$518$702
Net return over labor and management/acre$214-$1
Cost of production/bushel with labor & mgt$3.16$3.60

Table 6. Four-year average soybean financial summary for Pennsylvania and Minnesota (2016, 2017, 2018 and 2019)

StatePennsylvaniaMinnesota
Number of farms315272
Acres65338
Yield/acre, bushels5849
Direct expenses/acre  
Seed$72$56
Fertilizer$5$20
Crop chemicals$39$41
Custom hire$35$8
Land rent$110$174
Total$261$299
Overheads/acre:  
Hired labor$17$11
Fuel and oil$6$15
Repairs$13$27
Utilities$5$4
Interest$9$13
Farm/crop Insurance$4$25
Machine leases$1$7
Bldg leases$2$1
Machine & bldg depreciation$14$30
Dues and professional fees$1$3
Miscellaneous$2$9
Total$75$145
   
Total outflow$336$444
Net return over labor and management/acre$186$51
Cost of production/bushels with labor & mgt$5.99$8.18
Source : psu.edu

Trending Video

Moving Out The Biggest Group Of Calves We've Ever Done!

Video: Moving Out The Biggest Group Of Calves We've Ever Done!

SaskDutch Kid - Moving Out The Biggest Group Of Calves We've Ever Done!