Even as farmed animals have multiplied, populations of wild animals have crashed. The two trends are deeply connected. Humans convert wildlife habitat into pastures and farms, expanding living space for farm animals at the expense of many other animals.
This cannot continue. Humans must reckon with how we treat the myriad other species on the planet, whether we rely on them or not. As I argue in my new open-access book, the growing scarcity of animal species should make us grasp our responsibility towards the welfare of all animal species on the planet, not just those in farms.
Efforts to enshrine rights for animals is not enough. The focus has to be on our responsibilities to them, ensuring they lead good lives if in our care or are left well alone if they are not.
Should we care?
In the last 50 years, two-thirds of all wild animal populations have been lost.
The main cause is habitat loss, as native forest is felled to grow grass for cattle or corn and soya for livestock.
By weight, the world's farm animals and humans now dwarf the remaining wild animals. Farm animals weigh 630 million tons and humans 390 million tons, while wild land mammals now weigh just 20 million tons and marine mammals 40 million tons.
Wildlife numbers have fallen off a cliff across many kingdoms of life. Three quarters of flying insects are gone from monitored areas of Western Europe. One in eight bird species is threatened with extinction worldwide.
On animal welfare, philosophers have long argued one of two positions. The first is known as "utilitarianism." This approach argues for minimizing the bad things in the world and maximizing the good things, regardless of who benefits from them, humans or other animals. This theory-heavy approach does little to restore our relationship with wild animals because of the difficulties in deciding what is good and bad for animals.
Click here to see more...