The poll reflects a divided public, with most respondents supporting the court’s decision.
However, nearly a quarter still backing the original plan to proceed.
The portion of respondents who expressed indifference suggests that while the issue has sparked debate, it may not resonate equally across all demographics.
Supporters of the halt may be influenced by concerns over animal welfare, legal process, or skepticism about the necessity of culling in response to avian flu. Those in favour of continuing the cull may prioritize disease containment and public health protocols.
Meanwhile, the indifferent group could reflect either a lack of awareness or a perception that the issue does not directly affect them.
As the legal proceedings continue, the poll results offer insight into how Canadian farmers are engaging with the topic, and how divided opinions may shape future discussions around disease response and animal agriculture.
Photo Credit: Universal Ostrich Farm