The review consultant worked with producers and agricultural groups, including MBP, to determine why producer participation in forage insurance is low compared to participation in crop insurance.
“One of the main concerns was the gap between forage insurance coverage and the cost of replacing feed. Producers often stated the coverage levels aren't enough to make up for the cost of feed needed to address their shortfall,” said Callum.
The consultant made several recommendations, including improving awareness of the program. MBP staff have also heard this suggestion from producers, he said.
MBP staff look forward to working with both MASC and government representatives on improvements to the program, said Callum.
emholk/iStock/Getty Images Plus photo