Mr. Lane highlighted the high quality and low environmental impact of U.S. beef, questioning why the DOD wouldn't choose this readily available protein source. He expressed concern that lab-grown meat, produced in "chemical-filled bioreactors," is an inferior alternative to "wholesome, natural meat."
The NCBA fears that lab-grown meat could become a cheaper alternative to traditional beef, jeopardizing the livelihoods of American cattle ranchers. They believe the research undermines the dedication of veterans and active-duty troops who deserve the best quality food available.
This controversy reflects the ongoing debate regarding lab-grown meat as a potential future protein source. While some view it as a sustainable option, the cattle industry, as represented by the NCBA, raises concerns about its impact on traditional agriculture and the quality of food served to those who serve.